lawgon (lawgon) wrote,

GPL

Finaly read the GPL. As i suspected it is one sided in the sense that the person issuing the license makes no promises and gives no undertaking. For example, he does not say it is irrevocable. Since the copyright holder makes no promises and gives no undertaking, the licensee has no rights against the license holder in a court of law. I wonder how many worshippers of the GPL have taken the time to read it?
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded  

  • 20 comments