- contrasting styles
-

lawgon
- August 29th, 2006
At Delhi recently i had a chance to have a small conversation with Michael Tieman of redhat and a long conversation with Eben Moglen of FSF. Both Americans active in FOSS, but very very different. Michael is sort of tentative and is making a huge effort to understand India. He quotes Amartya Sen and Tagore. And says he tries to understand every country where he operates - and enjoys it. He gave a talk, and, unlike a lot of others who roll out the same talk everywhere they go, he tried to relate to what was happening in the conference around him. It was a tentative type of talk - he put some ideas down. Food for thought.
And a long chat with Eben Moglen. Totally opposite of Michael, he orates - he has vast experience and has his whole field at his fingertips. Never hums and haws, the sentences come rolling out, each one perfectly formed. Inspiring (but tiring). Got a a lot of information from him - and a glimpse of the battles being fought out there. Something about the strategy and tactics too.
So which style is more effective?